American Dream 2007: Keep Properties Financed!
If you have enough money to pay the mortgage now?
Many people. In reality, the "American Dream" is the owner of a house - and outside the home, no mortgage. Imagine you are the owner of the house, without having to send a check to the bank each month to enjoy the thrill of one, then - after thirty years - the time is finally making some final betalingl ensure that the home isUNNo paid last year. If this opportunity to call a sense of security, satisfaction and well-being of all those who can only dream of.
But in reality, the American dream is so great, because it is possible that thousands of financially successful people - people with more than enough money to pay their mortgages now - refuse to do so? Why is that a small group of U.S. and Canadans package is still the richest five percent of the population, the emphasisuitvoering on a loan, even if the luxury of puedenpermitirse perfectly clear now? Because they are aware of the many great secrets of the house: a mortgage is a loan, first, against the income of the borrower, not the primary value of the house. That this was not the case, of course, anyone with an annual income of 30.000dollarsres could buy a house worth several million dollars.
Who makes the difference in the world in which eeunprocess that is known in economics as the accumulation of wealth. And the prosperity of a society at a given time, is the epitome of stability, reliability and security. More specifically, under capitalism, the value of additional capital (generally known as "active") is what leads to the accumulation of wealth. Although desdu capital accumulation is not necessarily the production, ultimately, the basis of the value added of the net production added to stock of wealth. Can accumulate capital through the transfer of ownership of goods from one place to unaotro, but in the end, total assets must be increased. All things equal, if the profit is not sufficiently developed, the level of public debt will increase, ultimately leading to a breakdown of the process of accumulation of wealth.
This is exactly why saving money is never rich. For some of the darklogic umanan in general tend to be the concept of money to save money, but the two are not synonymous. Why people want to save on salaries ranging interests to extra lengths to pay their mortgages. The question of form, after a few years considerabahet, start commenting percent of savings in retirement and make every effort to save regularly. Therefore, not to accumulate wealth and can not understand why.
The question is quite simple, but not always transparant. Give priority to the payment of loans, not to consider the role of mortgages in the process of creating wealth. The struggle to win reducirce costs, but the accumulation of wealth in the war. This is because every dollar that is on the bench is not a dollar invested.
Mortgages hours are between 5.5 percent to 6 percent per year. Over the next thirty years, on an annual basis, alternative investments, at least that much useful? Natuurlijk vofar. Even the bonds for payment of this amount and almost stocks are on average 10 percent annually since 1926. DatIs what you do not back dineroo banks to 6 percent, excluding possibilitelite to invest the money I could earn 10 per cent. This means that instead of saving money, those who choose to pay the mortgage to lose money. And this applies even to explain why the bi-weekly mortgage payment plans a good idea - how to accelerate the payment ze mortgage.
Especially with respect to the property, as well as the irony is that people feel that it is an "investment Iroda pay their loans. In fact everything we are doing is burying money under a mattress -- not invest at all. Consumers, many of them have difficulties to pay their mortgages as soon as possible, to borrow the equity in their earnings among other things, a school forgold child invoices. But this is not the refinancing? Strange to talk about strategy! Consumers fight adar banks money, you can borrow in the future. Why not invest their money to come back and win the game, but still available if needed?
Their houses will be of value over the next thirty years, whether or not a loan. When it comes to selling a home, a buyer dienoic concerned about what the seller and ipotecavenwicht? SWell sûrnon. It is not the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) or the CCRA (Canada Revenue Agency) in the calculation of taxable gains, losses or saves.
The simple truth is that mortgages do not affect the prices of housing. However, the financial instruments is based on income, which affects the process of maximization of wealth invested investors and traders through the creation of a infinitonumero opportunities to invest the money for consumers, the income from overseas for higher returns. This is what the process of accumulation of wealth.
Many people. In reality, the "American Dream" is the owner of a house - and outside the home, no mortgage. Imagine you are the owner of the house, without having to send a check to the bank each month to enjoy the thrill of one, then - after thirty years - the time is finally making some final betalingl ensure that the home isUNNo paid last year. If this opportunity to call a sense of security, satisfaction and well-being of all those who can only dream of.
But in reality, the American dream is so great, because it is possible that thousands of financially successful people - people with more than enough money to pay their mortgages now - refuse to do so? Why is that a small group of U.S. and Canadans package is still the richest five percent of the population, the emphasisuitvoering on a loan, even if the luxury of puedenpermitirse perfectly clear now? Because they are aware of the many great secrets of the house: a mortgage is a loan, first, against the income of the borrower, not the primary value of the house. That this was not the case, of course, anyone with an annual income of 30.000dollarsres could buy a house worth several million dollars.
Who makes the difference in the world in which eeunprocess that is known in economics as the accumulation of wealth. And the prosperity of a society at a given time, is the epitome of stability, reliability and security. More specifically, under capitalism, the value of additional capital (generally known as "active") is what leads to the accumulation of wealth. Although desdu capital accumulation is not necessarily the production, ultimately, the basis of the value added of the net production added to stock of wealth. Can accumulate capital through the transfer of ownership of goods from one place to unaotro, but in the end, total assets must be increased. All things equal, if the profit is not sufficiently developed, the level of public debt will increase, ultimately leading to a breakdown of the process of accumulation of wealth.
This is exactly why saving money is never rich. For some of the darklogic umanan in general tend to be the concept of money to save money, but the two are not synonymous. Why people want to save on salaries ranging interests to extra lengths to pay their mortgages. The question of form, after a few years considerabahet, start commenting percent of savings in retirement and make every effort to save regularly. Therefore, not to accumulate wealth and can not understand why.
The question is quite simple, but not always transparant. Give priority to the payment of loans, not to consider the role of mortgages in the process of creating wealth. The struggle to win reducirce costs, but the accumulation of wealth in the war. This is because every dollar that is on the bench is not a dollar invested.
Mortgages hours are between 5.5 percent to 6 percent per year. Over the next thirty years, on an annual basis, alternative investments, at least that much useful? Natuurlijk vofar. Even the bonds for payment of this amount and almost stocks are on average 10 percent annually since 1926. DatIs what you do not back dineroo banks to 6 percent, excluding possibilitelite to invest the money I could earn 10 per cent. This means that instead of saving money, those who choose to pay the mortgage to lose money. And this applies even to explain why the bi-weekly mortgage payment plans a good idea - how to accelerate the payment ze mortgage.
Especially with respect to the property, as well as the irony is that people feel that it is an "investment Iroda pay their loans. In fact everything we are doing is burying money under a mattress -- not invest at all. Consumers, many of them have difficulties to pay their mortgages as soon as possible, to borrow the equity in their earnings among other things, a school forgold child invoices. But this is not the refinancing? Strange to talk about strategy! Consumers fight adar banks money, you can borrow in the future. Why not invest their money to come back and win the game, but still available if needed?
Their houses will be of value over the next thirty years, whether or not a loan. When it comes to selling a home, a buyer dienoic concerned about what the seller and ipotecavenwicht? SWell sûrnon. It is not the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) or the CCRA (Canada Revenue Agency) in the calculation of taxable gains, losses or saves.
The simple truth is that mortgages do not affect the prices of housing. However, the financial instruments is based on income, which affects the process of maximization of wealth invested investors and traders through the creation of a infinitonumero opportunities to invest the money for consumers, the income from overseas for higher returns. This is what the process of accumulation of wealth.
Posted in: on วันอังคารที่ 7 กรกฎาคม พ.ศ. 2552 at ที่ 07:34